Georgia vs Russia: country risk compared
Georgia currently carries the higher assessed risk (5.1 vs 4.6 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by higher AML/CFT effectiveness risk (6.4 vs 4.2).
🇬🇪 Georgia (5.1/10, High) vs 🇷🇺 Russia (4.6/10, Moderate).
Side by side
| Indicator | Georgia | Russia |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 5.1/10 (High) | 4.6/10 (Moderate) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | Sectoral exposure |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 3.8/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | 50/100 (rank #56) | 22/100 (rank #157) |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2020 | 2019 |
| BO register | None identified | None identified |
FATF mutual evaluations
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Poland vs Russia
- Moldova vs Russia
- Russia vs Slovakia
- Romania vs Russia
- Belarus vs Russia
- Czechia vs Russia
Active methodology 3.1.0; Georgia is complete with medium confidence and Russia is complete with medium confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.