Israel vs United Arab Emirates: country risk compared
United Arab Emirates currently carries the higher assessed risk (5.0 vs 3.2 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by higher AML/CFT effectiveness risk (7.6 vs 3.3).
🇮🇱 Israel (3.2/10, Moderate) vs 🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates (5.0/10, High).
Side by side
| Indicator | Israel | United Arab Emirates |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 3.2/10 (Moderate) | 5.0/10 (High) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | No listed programme identified |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 2.9/10 | 2.8/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | 62/100 (rank #35) | 69/100 (rank #21) |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2018 | 2020 |
| BO register | None identified | None identified |
FATF mutual evaluations
- Israel: last mutual evaluation 2018 · report
- United Arab Emirates: last mutual evaluation 2020 · report
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Bahrain vs United Arab Emirates
- Saudi Arabia vs United Arab Emirates
- Kuwait vs United Arab Emirates
- Oman vs United Arab Emirates
- Qatar vs United Arab Emirates
- Türkiye vs United Arab Emirates
Active methodology 3.1.0; Israel is complete with medium confidence and United Arab Emirates is complete with medium confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.