Mali vs Nigeria: country risk compared
Mali currently carries the higher assessed risk (7.3 vs 7.0 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by higher AML/CFT effectiveness risk (9.7 vs 9.4).
🇲🇱 Mali (7.3/10, Very high) vs 🇳🇬 Nigeria (7.0/10, Very high).
Side by side
| Indicator | Mali | Nigeria |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 7.3/10 (Very high) | 7.0/10 (Very high) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | Targeted exposure | No listed programme identified |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 6.4/10 | 6.1/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | 28/100 (rank #136) | 26/100 (rank #142) |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2020 | 2021 |
| BO register | None identified | Public (live since 2019) |
FATF mutual evaluations
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Burkina Faso vs Nigeria
- Benin vs Nigeria
- Nigeria vs The Gambia
- Mauritania vs Nigeria
- Niger vs Nigeria
- Nigeria vs Sierra Leone
Active methodology 3.1.0; Mali is complete with medium confidence and Nigeria is complete with high confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.