Palestine currently carries the higher assessed risk (6.3 vs 3.0 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by weaker rule-of-law and institutional governance.
🇵🇸 Palestine (6.3/10, High) vs 🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates (3.0/10, Moderate).
Side by side
| Indicator | Palestine | United Arab Emirates |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 6.3/10 (High) | 3.0/10 (Moderate) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | No listed programme identified |
| Rule of law (WGI risk) | 6.1/10 | 2.8/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | No score | 69/100 (rank #21) |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | Not assessed | 2020 |
| BO register | None identified | None identified |
FATF mutual evaluations
- United Arab Emirates: last mutual evaluation 2020 · report
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Türkiye vs United Arab Emirates
- Qatar vs United Arab Emirates
- Israel vs United Arab Emirates
- Oman vs United Arab Emirates
- Saudi Arabia vs United Arab Emirates
- Bahrain vs United Arab Emirates
Scores combine World Bank WGI governance, FATF listing status and sanctions exposure; CPI and enforcement volume are shown but not scored. Scoring methodology.