Monaco (Europe • Western Europe). Risk report as of the 19 Jun 2026 FATF plenary.
High country risk. Monaco's country risk score is 6.0/10, placing it in the high-risk band. The principal driver is weak voice and accountability. Monaco is subject to FATF increased monitoring. Monaco is not subject to comprehensive country-wide sanctions. Firms should apply additional scrutiny where exposure involves state-linked entities, restricted sectors, sensitive technology, dual-use goods or politically exposed counterparties.
Recommended treatment
Enhanced due diligence.
At a glance
- FATF status: Grey list (one indicator only; it does not set the overall country risk rating by itself)
- Comprehensive country sanctions: none identified. Targeted sanctions exposure: possible, screen applicable persons, entities and sectors
- Government effectiveness and rule of law: 2.0/10
- Corruption (CPI): no score
- Enforcement data: not yet assessed (no RegActions coverage)
Country Risk Score: 6.0/10 (High)
Higher score means higher country risk (global average 4.6). Full information available. Strong data coverage. Enforcement activity and CPI are shown for context but do not change the score.
All three parts of the score are available.
How this score was calculated
- Financial crime controls: 6.2/10 — 50% of this score
- Government effectiveness and rule of law: 2.0/10 — 30% of this score
- International sanctions: 0.0/10 — 20% of this score
- FATF grey-list status means the score cannot be lower than 6.0. This minimum set the final score.
International sanctions contributes 0.0 because the complete UN, UK, EU and US review found no direct country-level sanctions programme. People or organisations connected to the country may still appear on sanctions lists.
Show the exact calculation
aml 6.2 × 50% + governance 2 × 30% + sanctions 0 × 20% = 3.7; fatf-grey floor 6 applied; final 6
Principal risk drivers
- FATF increased-monitoring status
Mitigating factors
- No comprehensive country-wide sanctions programme.
- Comparatively stronger political stability (1.3/10).
- Risk is concentrated in specific counterparties, sectors and transactions rather than applying uniformly.
Business impact
- Customer onboarding (High): Additional ownership and control verification may be required.
- Payments and transactions (High): Review transaction purpose, counterparties and geographic routing.
- Trade and export activity (High): Screen goods, end users and potential dual-use exposure.
- Corporate clients (High): Assess state ownership, government links and political exposure.
- Ongoing monitoring (High): Apply alerts for ownership changes, sanctions and geopolitical developments.
Recommended controls
- Verify ultimate beneficial ownership using more than one reliable source.
- Identify state ownership, government influence and politically exposed persons.
- Screen entities, directors and beneficial owners against applicable sanctions lists.
- Apply enhanced review to technology, defence, telecommunications, financial services and dual-use activity.
- Document transaction purpose and source of funds where cross-border structures are complex.
- Escalate unresolved ownership opacity or adverse information to Compliance.
Enhanced due diligence triggers
- State ownership / control
- PEP involvement
- Sensitive / restricted sectors
- Opaque ownership
- Adverse media
- Dual-use goods & technology
- High-risk intermediary routing
FATF status: Grey list
Jurisdiction Under Increased Monitoring. Last reviewed 19 Jun 2026; next FATF plenary Oct 2026.
Source details
International sanctions by issuing body
- UN: No
- EU: No
- UK: No
- US: No
No means the complete UN, UK, EU and US review found no direct country-level programme. People or organisations may still appear on sanctions lists.
Government effectiveness and rule of law (World Bank 2024, percentile)
- Government Effectiveness: 85/100
- Regulatory Quality: 72/100
- Rule of Law: 80/100
Regulators and legal framework
FATF network
FATF network via MONEYVAL.
Last mutual evaluation: 2023 · report
National regulators
Regulator profiles not yet available on RegActions.
FIU: Egmont Group member (SICFIN)
Framework signals
- FATF listing: Grey list
- International sanctions: no listed programme identified
- BO register: Public (live since 2018)
- Corruption (CPI): no score
- Rule of law (WGI): 2.1/10 risk
Sector exposure
- Banking & payments (Elevated): FATF grey-list status elevates correspondent-banking risk
- Trade & export controls (Low): No sanctions programme or FATF black-list constraint identified
- Crypto & virtual assets (Elevated): FATF grey-list VASP supervision gaps raise virtual-asset risk
- Real estate & luxury assets (Low): Corruption indicators within normal range for high-value assets
- State-linked & procurement (Low): Political-stability and corruption governance within normal range
Derived from sanctions tier, FATF listing, World Bank WGI governance and CPI; no per-sector dataset is asserted.
Monaco: analysis
Monaco's profile is shaped almost entirely by its FATF grey-list status applied to an otherwise strong governance picture, itself among the strongest in the dataset. The governance domains are uniformly strong: political stability is strong (the joint lowest risk), rule of law and institutions is strong, and voice and accountability is strong. Corruption is the weakest governance domain but still reflects a well-functioning public sector. The grey-list classification, last reviewed in June 2026, is the key risk differentiator and must be monitored closely. No sanctions apply, and no enforcement actions are tracked.
Outlook
The principal forward-looking question for Monaco is the pace and outcome of its FATF action-plan implementation. Successful completion would remove the grey-list overlay and return Monaco to a low-risk position consistent with its governance profile. Delayed or incomplete remediation could sustain the current elevated rating beyond the next plenary. Firms should treat the grey-list status as the dominant watchpoint.
Key watchpoints
- Progress against Monaco's FATF action plan and the timing of any grey-list exit at upcoming plenary sessions.
- Any update to FATF status at the October 2026 plenary.
- Enhanced due diligence obligations that may apply under counterpart jurisdiction rules while grey-list status persists.
- Absence of CPI data limits independent corruption benchmarking; monitor any new transparency indices or MONEYVAL assessments.
Assessment currency
- FATF status: Increased monitoring (as of 19 Jun 2026)
- Sanctions exposure: None identified (as of Jul 2026)
- Governance (WGI): Latest dataset incorporated (as of 2024)
- Corruption (CPI): Not available (as of 2025)
- RegActions assessment: Reviewed (as of 19 Jun 2026)
Public evidence layer
FATF action: increased monitoring. FATF identifies the jurisdiction as under increased monitoring; apply the firm's risk-based controls and monitor remediation progress.
Contextual signals (not scored)
- FATF network membership: FATF regional network: MONEYVAL (present, as of 2026-07)
- EU non-cooperative tax jurisdictions: Not listed in Annex I (absent, as of 2026-02-17)
- Egmont Group FIU: SICFIN (present, as of 2026-07-17)
- Beneficial-ownership register: Public (live since 2018) (present, as of 2026-07-17)
- Transparency International CPI: No CPI result available (unavailable, as of 2025)
Evidence freshness
- FATF monitored-jurisdiction status: current; data 2026-06-19
- FATF mutual evaluation and follow-up ratings: current; data 2026-07-31; follow-up 2024-11; base assessment 2023-01
- World Bank governance indicators: current; data 2024
- UN, UK, EU and US sanctions regimes: current; data 2026-08-13
Contextual signals are public evidence only and do not change the immutable v2 score.
Download evidence PDF · CSV · JSON
Regional peer scores
- Belarus: 6.0/10 (High)
- Bosnia and Herzegovina: 6.0/10 (High)
- Bulgaria: 6.0/10 (High)
- Montenegro: 6.0/10 (High)
- Russia: 6.0/10 (High)
- Serbia: 6.0/10 (High)
FAQ
Is Monaco on the FATF grey list?
Yes. As of the 19 Jun 2026 FATF plenary, Monaco is on the FATF grey list (Jurisdictions Under Increased Monitoring). This is one AML indicator and does not by itself set Monaco's overall country risk rating. The next FATF plenary review is scheduled for Oct 2026.
Is Monaco subject to sanctions?
No country-level programme was identified. In the approved RegActions snapshot, no comprehensive or targeted country-wide sanctions programme was found for Monaco, but individual listed persons may still exist, so firms should continue to screen counterparties against the applicable lists.
What is Monaco's country risk rating?
RegActions rates Monaco at 6.0/10 (High risk), where a higher score means higher country risk. The score combines financial crime controls, government effectiveness and rule of law, and international sanctions.
What due diligence applies to Monaco?
Enhanced due diligence. This is decision-support based on Monaco's FATF grey list status, governance and sanctions signals, and is not a substitute for a firm's own risk assessment.
Source: FATF black & grey lists · World Bank WGI (CC BY 4.0 — World Bank WGI) · TI CPI (CC BY-ND 4.0 — Transparency International, display only)