Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (Americas • Caribbean). Risk report as of the 19 Jun 2026 FATF plenary.
Moderate country risk, with rule-of-law and institutional weakness. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's country risk score is 3.9/10, placing it in the moderate-risk band. The principal driver is weak rule of law and institutions. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is not currently FATF grey- or black-listed. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is not subject to comprehensive country-wide sanctions. Firms should apply additional scrutiny where exposure involves state-linked entities, restricted sectors, sensitive technology, dual-use goods or politically exposed counterparties.
Recommended treatment
Standard due diligence, with enhanced checks for defined risk triggers.
At a glance
- FATF status: Not currently listed (one indicator only; it does not set the overall country risk rating by itself)
- Comprehensive country sanctions: none identified. Targeted sanctions exposure: possible, screen applicable persons, entities and sectors
- Government effectiveness and rule of law: 3.5/10
- Corruption (CPI 2025): 63/100, rank #31 of 182
- Enforcement data: not yet assessed (no RegActions coverage)
Country Risk Score: 3.9/10 (Moderate)
Higher score means higher country risk (global average 4.6). Full information available. Strong data coverage. Enforcement activity and CPI are shown for context but do not change the score.
All three parts of the score are available.
How this score was calculated
- Financial crime controls: 5.6/10 — 50% of this score
- Government effectiveness and rule of law: 3.5/10 — 30% of this score
- International sanctions: 0.0/10 — 20% of this score
International sanctions contributes 0.0 because the complete UN, UK, EU and US review found no direct country-level sanctions programme. People or organisations connected to the country may still appear on sanctions lists.
Show the exact calculation
aml 5.6 × 50% + governance 3.5 × 30% + sanctions 0 × 20% = 3.9; final 3.9
Principal risk drivers
- Government effectiveness and rule of law drive the score; no FATF listing or direct country-level sanctions were identified
Mitigating factors
- Not currently on the FATF grey or black list.
- No comprehensive country-wide sanctions programme.
- Comparatively stronger political stability (1.6/10).
- Risk is concentrated in specific counterparties, sectors and transactions rather than applying uniformly.
Business impact
- Customer onboarding (Medium): Additional ownership and control verification may be required.
- Payments and transactions (Medium): Review transaction purpose, counterparties and geographic routing.
- Trade and export activity (Medium): Screen goods, end users and potential dual-use exposure.
- Corporate clients (Medium): Assess state ownership, government links and political exposure.
- Ongoing monitoring (Medium): Apply alerts for ownership changes, sanctions and geopolitical developments.
Recommended controls
- Verify ultimate beneficial ownership using more than one reliable source.
- Identify state ownership, government influence and politically exposed persons.
- Screen entities, directors and beneficial owners against applicable sanctions lists.
- Apply enhanced review to technology, defence, telecommunications, financial services and dual-use activity.
- Document transaction purpose and source of funds where cross-border structures are complex.
- Escalate unresolved ownership opacity or adverse information to Compliance.
Enhanced due diligence triggers
- State ownership / control
- PEP involvement
- Sensitive / restricted sectors
- Opaque ownership
- Adverse media
- Dual-use goods & technology
- High-risk intermediary routing
FATF status: Not currently listed
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is not on the FATF grey or black list as of the 19 Jun 2026 plenary.
Source details
International sanctions by issuing body
- UN: No
- EU: No
- UK: No
- US: No
No means the complete UN, UK, EU and US review found no direct country-level programme. People or organisations may still appear on sanctions lists.
Government effectiveness and rule of law (World Bank 2024, percentile)
- Government Effectiveness: 57/100
- Regulatory Quality: 57/100
- Rule of Law: 66/100
Regulators and legal framework
FATF network
FATF network via CFATF.
Last mutual evaluation: 2024 · report
National regulators
Regulator profiles not yet available on RegActions.
FIU: Egmont Group member (FIU-VC)
Framework signals
- FATF listing: Not currently listed
- International sanctions: no listed programme identified
- Corruption (CPI 2025): 63/100, rank #31 of 182
- Rule of law (WGI): 4.0/10 risk
Sector exposure
- Banking & payments (Low): No FATF listing, rule-of-law governance within normal range
- Trade & export controls (Low): No sanctions programme or FATF black-list constraint identified
- Crypto & virtual assets (Low): No FATF listing, accountability governance within normal range
- Real estate & luxury assets (Low): Corruption indicators within normal range for high-value assets
- State-linked & procurement (Low): Political-stability and corruption governance within normal range
Derived from sanctions tier, FATF listing, World Bank WGI governance and CPI; no per-sector dataset is asserted.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: analysis
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is an Eastern Caribbean state assessed for AML/CFT purposes by the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF). Its risk picture is governance-derived, with no FATF or sanctions overlay. The governance base is solid: political stability is strong, accountability is moderate, corruption is moderate and rule of law is moderate. The CPI reading is comparatively strong and corroborates a relatively clean public-sector picture, while the country sits in the upper third of the World Bank governance indicators. Unlike several of its Eastern Caribbean neighbours, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines does not operate a citizenship-by-investment programme, which removes one common source of identity-verification risk. It has an international financial-services sector and is subject to CFATF mutual evaluation and follow-up reporting.
Outlook
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines' profile reflects a sound governance base and a comparatively clean CPI reading. The forward picture depends on continued CFATF follow-up remediation, the effectiveness of supervision for its international financial-services sector, and the corruption and rule-of-law domains as the weakest governance readings. Firms should apply proportionate due diligence and monitor CFATF follow-up reporting and the October 2026 FATF plenary for any change in status.
Key watchpoints
- CFATF follow-up reporting on the country's mutual evaluation and any technical compliance re-ratings.
- October 2026 FATF plenary for any change in listing status.
- Beneficial ownership transparency and supervision of the international financial-services sector.
- Corruption (moderate) and rule of law (moderate) domains as the weakest governance readings.
Assessment currency
- FATF status: Not listed (as of 19 Jun 2026)
- Sanctions exposure: None identified (as of Jul 2026)
- Governance (WGI): Latest dataset incorporated (as of 2024)
- Corruption (CPI): 63/100 (as of 2025)
- RegActions assessment: Reviewed (as of 19 Jun 2026)
Public evidence layer
FATF action: none. No FATF call-for-action or increased-monitoring status was identified at the latest plenary. This does not establish low risk.
Contextual signals (not scored)
- FATF network membership: FATF regional network: CFATF (present, as of 2026-07)
- EU non-cooperative tax jurisdictions: Not listed in Annex I (absent, as of 2026-02-17)
- Egmont Group FIU: FIU-VC (present, as of 2026-07-17)
- Beneficial-ownership register: No live register identified in the source (unavailable, as of 2026-07-17)
- Transparency International CPI: 63/100, rank 31 (present, as of 2025)
Evidence freshness
- FATF monitored-jurisdiction status: current; data 2026-06-19
- FATF mutual evaluation and follow-up ratings: current; data 2026-07-31; follow-up 2026-05; base assessment 2024-01
- World Bank governance indicators: current; data 2024
- UN, UK, EU and US sanctions regimes: current; data 2026-08-13
Contextual signals are public evidence only and do not change the immutable v2 score.
Download evidence PDF · CSV · JSON
Regional peer scores
- Cuba: 8.0/10 (Very high)
- Venezuela: 7.8/10 (Very high)
- Haiti: 7.6/10 (Very high)
- Bolivia: 6.0/10 (High)
- Nicaragua: 5.6/10 (High)
- Suriname: 5.6/10 (High)
FAQ
Is Saint Vincent and the Grenadines on the FATF grey list?
No. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is not on the FATF grey or black list as of the 19 Jun 2026 plenary. FATF listing is one AML indicator; absence from the list does not by itself make Saint Vincent and the Grenadines low risk. The next FATF plenary review is scheduled for Oct 2026.
Is Saint Vincent and the Grenadines subject to sanctions?
No country-level programme was identified. In the approved RegActions snapshot, no comprehensive or targeted country-wide sanctions programme was found for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, but individual listed persons may still exist, so firms should continue to screen counterparties against the applicable lists.
What is Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's country risk rating?
RegActions rates Saint Vincent and the Grenadines at 3.9/10 (Moderate risk), where a higher score means higher country risk. The score combines financial crime controls, government effectiveness and rule of law, and international sanctions. Transparency International's 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index scores Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 63/100 (rank #31 of 182).
What due diligence applies to Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Standard due diligence, with enhanced checks for defined risk triggers. This is decision-support based on Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's FATF status, governance and sanctions signals, and is not a substitute for a firm's own risk assessment.
Source: FATF black & grey lists · World Bank WGI (CC BY 4.0 — World Bank WGI) · TI CPI (CC BY-ND 4.0 — Transparency International, display only)