Sudan — Country Risk Report

Sudan (Africa • North Africa). Risk report as of the 19 Jun 2026 FATF plenary.

Very high country risk, with elevated corruption risk. Sudan's country risk score is 7.1/10, placing it in the very high-risk band. Some information is unavailable, so the available parts are rebalanced and the country will not be labelled Low risk while information is missing. The principal driver is weak corruption, alongside rule of law and institutions risk. Sudan is not currently FATF grey- or black-listed. Sudan is not subject to comprehensive country-wide sanctions. Firms should apply additional scrutiny where exposure involves state-linked entities, restricted sectors, sensitive technology, dual-use goods or politically exposed counterparties.

Recommended treatment

Enhanced due diligence.

At a glance

• FATF status: Not currently listed (one indicator only; it does not set the overall country risk rating by itself)
• Comprehensive country sanctions: none identified. Targeted sanctions exposure: programmes in place, screen applicable lists
• Government effectiveness and rule of law: 7.6/10
• Corruption (CPI 2025): 14/100, rank #175 of 182
• Enforcement data: not yet assessed (no RegActions coverage)

Country Risk Score: 7.1/10 (Very high)

Higher score means higher country risk (global average 4.6). Some information unavailable. Limited supporting information. Enforcement activity and CPI are shown for context but do not change the score.

One of the three parts is unavailable. The available parts are rebalanced, and the result will not be labelled Low risk while information is missing.

How this score was calculated

• Financial crime controls: information unavailable — 0% of this score
• Government effectiveness and rule of law: 7.6/10 — 60% of this score
• International sanctions: 6.4/10 — 40% of this score
• Financial crime controls information is unavailable.
• sector-wide international sanctions sets a minimum of 6.0, but the calculated score was already higher.

Principal risk drivers

• Sectoral sanctions exposure
• Corruption (WGI) — 8.4/10
• Rule of law & institutions — 7.6/10
• Voice & accountability — 7.6/10
• Political stability — 6.9/10

Mitigating factors

• Not currently on the FATF grey or black list.
• No comprehensive country-wide sanctions programme.
• Risk is concentrated in specific counterparties, sectors and transactions rather than applying uniformly.

Business impact

• Customer onboarding (Enhanced): Additional ownership and control verification may be required.
• Payments and transactions (Enhanced): Review transaction purpose, counterparties and geographic routing.
• Trade and export activity (Enhanced): Screen goods, end users and potential dual-use exposure.
• Corporate clients (Enhanced): Assess state ownership, government links and political exposure.
• Ongoing monitoring (Enhanced): Apply alerts for ownership changes, sanctions and geopolitical developments.

Recommended controls

• Verify ultimate beneficial ownership using more than one reliable source.
• Identify state ownership, government influence and politically exposed persons.
• Screen entities, directors and beneficial owners against applicable sanctions lists.
• Apply enhanced review to technology, defence, telecommunications, financial services and dual-use activity.
• Document transaction purpose and source of funds where cross-border structures are complex.
• Escalate unresolved ownership opacity or adverse information to Compliance.

Enhanced due diligence triggers

• State ownership / control
• PEP involvement
• Sensitive / restricted sectors
• Opaque ownership
• Adverse media
• Dual-use goods & technology
• High-risk intermediary routing

FATF status: Not currently listed

Sudan is not on the FATF grey or black list as of the 19 Jun 2026 plenary.

Sanctions: Sectoral

• EU — targeted: Restrictive measures in view of activities undermining the stability and the political transition of Sudan (source)
• EU — sectoral: Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Sudan (source)
• OFAC — targeted: Sudan and Darfur Sanctions (source)
• UK — sectoral: Sudan sanctions (source)
• UN — sectoral: 1591 Sudan sanctions (source)

Source details

International sanctions by issuing body

• UN: Yes (Sectoral)
• EU: Yes (Sectoral)
• UK: Yes (Sectoral)
• US: Yes (Targeted)

No means the complete UN, UK, EU and US review found no direct country-level programme. People or organisations may still appear on sanctions lists.

Government effectiveness and rule of law (World Bank 2024, percentile)

• Government Effectiveness: 16/100
• Regulatory Quality: 29/100
• Rule of Law: 26/100

Regulators and legal framework

FATF network

FATF network via MENAFATF.

• Middle East and North Africa Financial Action Task Force

National regulators

Regulator profiles not yet available on RegActions.

FIU: Egmont Group member (FIUSU)

Framework signals

• FATF listing: Not currently listed
• International sanctions: sectoral exposure
• Corruption (CPI 2025): 14/100, rank #175 of 182
• Rule of law (WGI): 7.6/10 risk

Sector exposure

• Banking & payments (Elevated): Weak rule-of-law governance (WGI 7.6/10 risk)
• Trade & export controls (High): Sectoral sanctions: Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Sudan
• Crypto & virtual assets (Elevated): Weak accountability governance (WGI 7.6/10 risk)
• Real estate & luxury assets (High): Severe corruption exposure (CPI 14/100) drives laundering risk
• State-linked & procurement (High): High state-capture risk (corruption WGI 8.4/10)

Derived from sanctions tier, FATF listing, World Bank WGI governance and CPI; no per-sector dataset is asserted.

Sudan: analysis

Sudan's profile is driven by severe weaknesses across all four governance domains. Corruption (weighted 35%) and rule of law (weighted 40%) are the principal contributors. Political stability (weighted 15%) and voice and accountability (weighted 10%) are also acutely elevated, reflecting a deeply fragile institutional environment. Sudan is not on the FATF grey or black list and carries no sanctions. Sudan sits in the lowest quartile of the World Bank governance indicators. The CPI reading confirms the severity of the corruption risk.

Outlook

Sudan's very high risk profile reflects deep structural fragility, including conflict dynamics and severely degraded institutional capacity. Meaningful risk reduction would require sustained and verifiable progress in governance, rule of law, and AML/CFT supervisory capacity over an extended period. Firms should apply stringent enhanced due diligence to any Sudan-linked exposures and should monitor FATF listing decisions closely, as the governance profile would support future scrutiny.

Key watchpoints

• Watch for any FATF listing decision, as the governance profile is consistent with grey-list risk.
• Monitor political stability and conflict developments that could further degrade institutional capacity.
• Apply enhanced due diligence to all transactions and counterparties with a Sudan nexus.
• Track CPI and WGI trends for any signals of governance deterioration or improvement.

Assessment currency

• FATF status: Not listed (as of 19 Jun 2026)
• Sanctions exposure: Targeted programmes in place (as of Jul 2026)
• Governance (WGI): Latest dataset incorporated (as of 2024)
• Corruption (CPI): 14/100 (as of 2025)
• RegActions assessment: Reviewed (as of 19 Jun 2026)

Public evidence layer

FATF action: none. No FATF call-for-action or increased-monitoring status was identified at the latest plenary. This does not establish low risk.

Contextual signals (not scored)

• FATF network membership: FATF regional network: MENAFATF (present, as of 2026-07)
• EU non-cooperative tax jurisdictions: Not listed in Annex I (absent, as of 2026-02-17)
• Egmont Group FIU: FIUSU (present, as of 2026-07-17)
• Beneficial-ownership register: No live register identified in the source (unavailable, as of 2026-07-17)
• Transparency International CPI: 14/100, rank 175 (present, as of 2025)

Evidence freshness

• FATF monitored-jurisdiction status: current; data 2026-06-19
• FATF mutual evaluation and follow-up ratings: current; data 2026-07-31
• World Bank governance indicators: current; data 2024
• UN, UK, EU and US sanctions regimes: current; data 2026-08-13

Contextual signals are public evidence only and do not change the immutable v2 score.

Download evidence PDF · CSV · JSON

Regional peer scores

• Central African Republic: 7.8/10 (Very high)
• Democratic Republic of the Congo: 7.6/10 (Very high)
• Somalia: 7.3/10 (Very high)
• South Sudan: 7.3/10 (Very high)
• Eritrea: 6.9/10 (High)
• Libya: 6.9/10 (High)

Source: FATF black & grey lists · World Bank WGI (CC BY 4.0 — World Bank WGI) · TI CPI (CC BY-ND 4.0 — Transparency International, display only)