Aruba vs Cayman Islands: country risk compared
Cayman Islands currently carries the higher assessed risk (4.9 vs 3.8 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by higher AML/CFT effectiveness risk (8.2 vs 5.2).
🇦🇼 Aruba (3.8/10, Moderate) vs 🇰🇾 Cayman Islands (4.9/10, Moderate).
Side by side
| Indicator | Aruba | Cayman Islands |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 3.8/10 (Moderate) | 4.9/10 (Moderate) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | No listed programme identified |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 2.9/10 | 2.8/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | No score | No score |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2022 | 2019 |
| BO register | None identified | Restricted (live since 2017) |
FATF mutual evaluations
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Anguilla vs Cayman Islands
- Bermuda vs Cayman Islands
- Antigua and Barbuda vs Cayman Islands
- Bahamas vs Cayman Islands
- Barbados vs Cayman Islands
- Cayman Islands vs Jersey
Active methodology 3.1.0; Aruba is complete with high confidence and Cayman Islands is complete with medium confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.