Cayman Islands currently carries the higher assessed risk (2.9 vs 2.8 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by weaker governance indicators overall.
🇧🇧 Barbados (2.8/10, Low) vs 🇰🇾 Cayman Islands (2.9/10, Low).
Side by side
| Indicator | Barbados | Cayman Islands |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 2.8/10 (Low) | 2.9/10 (Low) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | No listed programme identified |
| Rule of law (WGI risk) | 3.5/10 | 2.8/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | 68/100 (rank #24) | No score |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2018 | 2019 |
| BO register | None identified | Restricted (live since 2017) |
FATF mutual evaluations
- Barbados: last mutual evaluation 2018 · report
- Cayman Islands: last mutual evaluation 2019 · report
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Aruba vs Cayman Islands
- Bahamas vs Cayman Islands
- Anguilla vs Cayman Islands
- Bermuda vs Cayman Islands
- Cayman Islands vs Jersey
- Antigua and Barbuda vs Cayman Islands
Scores combine World Bank WGI governance, FATF listing status and sanctions exposure; CPI and enforcement volume are shown but not scored. Scoring methodology.