Liechtenstein vs Switzerland: country risk compared
Liechtenstein currently carries the higher assessed risk (3.4 vs 3.1 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by higher AML/CFT effectiveness risk (5.2 vs 4.5).
🇱🇮 Liechtenstein (3.4/10, Moderate) vs 🇨🇠Switzerland (3.1/10, Moderate).
Side by side
| Indicator | Liechtenstein | Switzerland |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 3.4/10 (Moderate) | 3.1/10 (Moderate) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | No listed programme identified |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 1.7/10 | 1.4/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | No score | 80/100 (rank #6) |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2022 | 2016 |
| BO register | None identified | None identified |
FATF mutual evaluations
- Liechtenstein: last mutual evaluation 2022 · report
- Switzerland: last mutual evaluation 2016 · report
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Germany vs Liechtenstein
- Germany vs Switzerland
- France vs Switzerland
- France vs Liechtenstein
- Luxembourg vs Switzerland
- Netherlands vs Switzerland
Active methodology 3.1.0; Liechtenstein is complete with high confidence and Switzerland is complete with low confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.