Mexico vs Trinidad and Tobago: country risk compared
Trinidad and Tobago currently carries the higher assessed risk (5.6 vs 5.4 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by higher AML/CFT effectiveness risk (8.2 vs 6.4).
🇲🇽 Mexico (5.4/10, High) vs 🇹🇹 Trinidad and Tobago (5.6/10, High).
Side by side
| Indicator | Mexico | Trinidad and Tobago |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 5.4/10 (High) | 5.6/10 (High) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | No listed programme identified |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 5.5/10 | 4.8/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | 27/100 (rank #141) | 41/100 (rank #81) |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2018 | 2016 |
| BO register | None identified | Public (live since 2019) |
FATF mutual evaluations
- Mexico: last mutual evaluation 2018 · report
- Trinidad and Tobago: last mutual evaluation 2016 · report
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Mexico vs United States
- Canada vs Mexico
- Honduras vs Mexico
- Ecuador vs Mexico
- Argentina vs Mexico
- El Salvador vs Mexico
Active methodology 3.1.0; Mexico is complete with low confidence and Trinidad and Tobago is complete with low confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.