Philippines vs Singapore: country risk compared
Philippines currently carries the higher assessed risk (6.1 vs 2.9 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by higher AML/CFT effectiveness risk (8.2 vs 4.5).
🇵🇠Philippines (6.1/10, High) vs 🇸🇬 Singapore (2.9/10, Lower).
Side by side
| Indicator | Philippines | Singapore |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 6.1/10 (High) | 2.9/10 (Lower) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | No listed programme identified |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 4.8/10 | 1.1/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | 32/100 (rank #120) | 84/100 (rank #3) |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2019 | 2026 |
| BO register | Public (live since 2018) | Restricted (live since 2020) |
FATF mutual evaluations
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Malaysia vs Singapore
- Brunei vs Singapore
- Indonesia vs Singapore
- Singapore vs Thailand
- Singapore vs Vietnam
- Singapore vs Timor-Leste
Active methodology 3.1.0; Philippines is complete with medium confidence and Singapore is complete with high confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.