Singapore vs Timor-Leste: country risk compared
Timor-Leste currently carries the higher assessed risk (6.6 vs 2.9 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by higher AML/CFT effectiveness risk (8.5 vs 4.5).
🇸🇬 Singapore (2.9/10, Lower) vs 🇹🇱 Timor-Leste (6.6/10, High).
Side by side
| Indicator | Singapore | Timor-Leste |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 2.9/10 (Lower) | 6.6/10 (High) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | No listed programme identified |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 1.1/10 | 5.9/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | 84/100 (rank #3) | 44/100 (rank #73) |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2026 | 2024 |
| BO register | Restricted (live since 2020) | None identified |
FATF mutual evaluations
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Malaysia vs Singapore
- Brunei vs Singapore
- Indonesia vs Singapore
- Singapore vs Thailand
- Philippines vs Singapore
- Singapore vs Vietnam
Active methodology 3.1.0; Singapore is complete with high confidence and Timor-Leste is complete with high confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.