Guernsey — Country Risk Report
Guernsey (Offshore / IFC • Crown Dependency). Risk report as of the 19 Jun 2026 FATF plenary.
Moderate country risk, with AML/CFT effectiveness gaps. Guernsey's country risk score is 3.5/10, placing it in the moderate-risk band. Some information is unavailable, so the available parts are rebalanced and the country will not be labelled Low risk while information is missing. The principal score driver is AML/CFT effectiveness, contributing 3.1 of 3.5 points. Separately, the treatment overlays show that Guernsey is not currently FATF grey- or black-listed, and that Guernsey is not subject to comprehensive country-wide sanctions and has no direct country-level programme identified. Firms should apply additional scrutiny where exposure involves state-linked entities, restricted sectors, sensitive technology, dual-use goods or politically exposed counterparties.
Recommended treatment
Standard due diligence for most relationships, with enhanced checks where defined risk triggers are present.
At a glance
- FATF status: Not currently listed (one indicator only; it does not set the overall country risk rating by itself)
- No direct country-level sanctions programme identified; sanctions remain a legal treatment overlay and applicable lists must still be screened.
- Governance and institutions: information unavailable
- Corruption (CPI): no score
- Enforcement: 1 live regulator feed; current totals are loaded from the live evidence API
Country Risk Score: 3.5/10 (Moderate)
Higher score means higher country risk (global average 5.5). Some information unavailable. Provisional composite score. Limited supporting evidence. Enforcement activity and CPI are context only; FATF listing and sanctions are regulatory overlays except the labelled FATF listing status used where no mutual evaluation exists.
Some underlying pillars are unavailable. Available weights are rebalanced; missing evidence is not treated as low risk. Some underlying evidence is unavailable; the available pillars are reweighted transparently and the result should not be treated as equally certain as a composite score. Weight sensitivity 3.3–3.6/10.
How this score was calculated
- AML/CFT effectiveness: 4.5/10 — 69% of this score
- Technical compliance: 1.2/10 — 31% of this score
- Governance and institutions: information unavailable — 0% of this score
- World Bank governance data is incomplete
Sanctions treatment: No direct programme identified. FATF treatment: none.
Show the exact calculation
effectiveness 4.5 × 69.2% + safeguards 1.2 × 30.8% = 3.5; sanctions and FATF listing are overlays except a labelled FATF listing substitute where no mutual evaluation exists
Principal risk drivers
- AML/CFT effectiveness: 4.5/10 × 69% = 3.1 points
- Technical compliance: 1.2/10 × 31% = 0.4 points
Mitigating factors
- Not currently on the FATF grey or black list.
- No comprehensive country-wide sanctions programme.
- Risk is concentrated in specific counterparties, sectors and transactions rather than applying uniformly.
Business impact
- Customer onboarding (Elevated): Verify ultimate beneficial ownership and control from more than one source.
- Payments and transactions (Elevated): Review transaction purpose, counterparties and the full payment routing.
- Trade and export activity (Elevated): Screen goods, end users and potential dual-use exposure.
- Corporate clients (Review): Assess state ownership, government links and political exposure.
- Ongoing monitoring (Elevated): Alert on ownership changes, new designations and status changes.
Recommended controls
- Verify ultimate beneficial ownership using more than one reliable source.
- Identify state ownership, government influence and politically exposed persons.
- Screen entities, directors and beneficial owners against applicable sanctions lists.
- Apply enhanced review to technology, defence, telecommunications, financial services and dual-use activity.
- Document transaction purpose and source of funds where cross-border structures are complex.
- Escalate unresolved ownership opacity or adverse information to Compliance.
Enhanced due diligence triggers
- State ownership / control
- PEP involvement
- Sensitive / restricted sectors
- Opaque ownership
- Adverse media
- Dual-use goods & technology
- High-risk intermediary routing
FATF status: Not currently listed
Guernsey is not on the FATF grey or black list as of the 19 Jun 2026 plenary.
Source details
International sanctions by issuing body
- UN: No
- EU: No
- UK: No
- US: No
No means the complete UN, UK, EU and US review found no direct country-level programme. People or organisations may still appear on sanctions lists.
Government effectiveness and rule of law (World Bank 2024, percentile)
- Government Effectiveness: no data
- Regulatory Quality: no data
- Rule of Law: no data
Enforcement activity
RegActions has 1 live regulator feed mapped to Guernsey. Current action totals are loaded from the live evidence API rather than the static registry.
- GFSC — Guernsey Financial Services Commission (live feed, 2005-2026)
The composite RegActions Country Risk Score does not use enforcement volume.
Regulators and legal framework
FATF network
FATF network via MONEYVAL.
Last mutual evaluation: 2024 · report
National regulators
- GFSC — Guernsey Financial Services Commission (live feed, 2005-2026)
FIU: Egmont Group member (FIS)
Framework signals
- FATF listing: Not currently listed
- International sanctions: no direct country programme identified (legal treatment overlay remains applicable)
- BO register: Restricted (live since 2018)
- Corruption (CPI): no score
- Rule of law (WGI): no data
Regulatory ecosystem and enforcement visibility
This evidence map is separate from Country Risk v3. It describes official mandates, publication access and RegActions coverage; it does not judge regulatory strength or add points to country risk.
Transparency Index: not scored · Evidence disposition: local-authority-evidence · Mapped official authorities: 2.
Evidence level: Level 3: Enforcement visible. The ladder uses the authority evidenceLevel schema directly and does not infer a level from a URL, site access or RegActions feed count.
- 1. Identity confirmed — The authority and its mandate are evidenced by official directory provenance.
- 2. Regulatory activity visible — A qualified authority-owned route has provisional dated activity in the first-page scan.
- 3. Enforcement visible — A qualified authority-owned enforcement route has provisional dated activity in the first-page scan.
- 4. Score eligible — Shown only when the authority evidence schema explicitly records score-eligible; no authority currently does.
How to read activity and enforcement visibility
Only qualified authority-owned routes can support Level 2 or Level 3. External official context and unqualified candidates do not promote the evidence level. Blocked and unavailable sources remain unknown.
Enforcement visibility: 1 authorities are classified enforcement-visible by the authority evidence schema, based on qualified authority-owned route evidence and provisional first-page month observations. This is not a validated engagement frequency.
Authorities and mandate evidence
Financial Intelligence Service (FIS) — Level 1: Identity confirmed · Official site reachable
Mandates: Financial intelligence · Access status: Official site reachable · Research/publication snapshot checked: 2026-08-20
Provisional first-page scan signal
Signal: unknown · Observed month count: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown.
No qualified authority-owned dated route supports an activity signal. This is not evidence of inactivity; blocked, external-context, low-frequency and unvalidated sources remain unknown.
Scan contract and precision
automated-first-page-date-scan · 2024-01 to 2026-08 · as of 2026-08-20 · month precision · first-page-only-unvalidated. This is not a validated engagement frequency.
Publication candidates and qualification
- Official authority-owned enforcement route: Sanctions
Authority-owned and approved for the human-reviewed route contract.
Route type: sanctions_or_penalty_list · Source scope: authority-owned · Qualification: approved-for-human-contract · Provisional scan signal: no-dated-first-page-signal · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Current Sanction Regimes
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Official authority-owned enforcement route: Sanctions
Guernsey Financial Services Commission — Level 3: Enforcement visible · Official site reachable
Mandates: Prudential supervision, Securities, Insurance, Pensions · Access status: Official site reachable · Research/publication snapshot checked: 2026-08-20
Provisional first-page scan signal
Signal: low-frequency · Observed month count: 2 · Latest observed month: 2026-08.
Provisional automated first-page date scan on an authority-owned qualified route. It is not a validated publication frequency or effectiveness measure.
Scan contract and precision
automated-first-page-date-scan · 2024-01 to 2026-08 · as of 2026-08-20 · month precision · first-page-only-unvalidated. This is not a validated engagement frequency.
Publication candidates and qualification
- Unqualified publication candidate: Senior Decision Makers
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Notices, Instructions & Warnings
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Sanctions
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Enforcement
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Our People
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Decision Making Process
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Enforcement Policy
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Enforcement Powers
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Judicial Decisions
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Prohibitions
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Public Statements
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Disqualified Directors
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Decision of the European Court of Human Rights
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Notice of application for administration management ord…
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Official authority-owned enforcement route: More Sanctions Notices
Authority-owned and approved for the human-reviewed route contract.
Route type: sanctions_or_penalty_list · Source scope: authority-owned · Qualification: approved-for-human-contract · Provisional scan signal: low-frequency-first-page-signal · Observed months: 2 · Latest observed month: 2026-08
- Unqualified publication candidate: Sanctions Notice - ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Sanctions Notice - ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Sanctions Notice - ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Sanctions Notice - Russia (Ships)
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Sanctions Notice - Russia
Research candidate only; it is not promoted to an official enforcement or regulatory-update route.
Route type: not classified · Source scope: not classified · Qualification: not classified · Provisional scan signal: not-observable · Observed months: 0 · Latest observed month: unknown
- Unqualified publication candidate: Senior Decision Makers
Download regulatory ecosystem PDF · CSV · JSON
Sector exposure
- Banking & payments (Review): Governance pillar unavailable; no low-exposure conclusion
- Trade & export controls (Low): No direct sanctions or FATF call-for-action overlay identified
- Crypto & virtual assets (Low): No FATF overlay and effectiveness pillar within normal range
- Real estate & luxury assets (Review): Governance evidence unavailable; no low-exposure conclusion
- State-linked & procurement (Low): Current risk pillars show no elevated procurement signal
Derived from sanctions tier, FATF listing, World Bank WGI governance and CPI; no per-sector dataset is asserted.
Guernsey: analysis
Guernsey's headline scoring rests on a limited evidence base, as World Bank WGI governance domain data are not published for the jurisdiction; the data gap is not itself a positive or negative assessment. No FATF or sanctions overlay applies. As a Crown Dependency and internationally recognised offshore financial centre, Guernsey operates under an AML/CFT framework aligned with UK and FATF standards. The GFSC's 28 enforcement actions over 2005 to 2026 indicate a consistent and engaged supervisory approach. In the absence of WGI data, firms should treat Guernsey's risk as evidence-limited and rely on regulatory guidance and third-party country risk assessments.
Outlook
Guernsey's regulatory framework and enforcement track record support a low-risk characterisation in practice. The primary monitoring considerations are the effectiveness of beneficial ownership controls, the robustness of AML/CFT supervision for complex structures, and ongoing alignment with evolving international standards. Any future WGI data availability or FATF assessment relevant to Guernsey would refine the modelled risk picture.
Key watchpoints
- GFSC enforcement activity and supervisory focus areas.
- Beneficial ownership transparency standards and any developments in public register access.
- International information-exchange obligations and compliance with global standards.
- Any FATF assessment outcomes or changes to Guernsey's AML/CFT framework status.
Assessment currency
- FATF status: Not listed (as of 19 Jun 2026)
- Sanctions exposure: None identified (as of Jul 2026)
- Governance (WGI): Latest dataset incorporated (as of 2024)
- Corruption (CPI): Not available (as of 2025)
- RegActions assessment: Reviewed (as of 19 Jun 2026)
Public evidence layer
FATF action: none. No FATF call-for-action or increased-monitoring status was identified at the latest plenary. This does not establish low risk.
Contextual signals (not scored)
- FATF network membership: FATF regional network: MONEYVAL (present, as of 2026-07)
- EU non-cooperative tax jurisdictions: Not listed in Annex I (absent, as of 2026-02-17)
- Egmont Group FIU: FIS (present, as of 2026-07-17)
- Beneficial-ownership register: Restricted (live since 2018) (present, as of 2026-08-23)
- Transparency International CPI: No CPI result available (unavailable, as of 2025)
Evidence freshness
- FATF monitored-jurisdiction status: current; data 2026-06-19
- FATF mutual evaluation and follow-up ratings: current; data 2026-08-24; follow-up 2024-12; base assessment 2024-12
- World Bank governance indicators: current; data 2024
- UN, UK, EU and US sanctions regimes: current; data 2026-08-30
Contextual signals are public evidence only and do not change the current country-risk score.
Download evidence PDF · CSV · JSON
Contextual risk evidence (not scored)
These eight evidence families provide context only. They do not change the v3.1 headline score. Unavailable means no reviewed, country-comparable evidence is currently ingested; it does not mean the risk is absent.
- Organised crime: Not available. No reviewed country-level organised-crime dataset is currently checked in; no risk value is inferred. Candidate sources are research leads only; they have not been ingested as evidence.
- Fraud and cybercrime: Not available. No reviewed country-level fraud or cybercrime dataset is currently checked in; no risk value is inferred. Candidate sources are research leads only; they have not been ingested as evidence.
- Terrorism and proliferation financing: Not available. No reviewed country-comparable terrorism/proliferation threat dataset is currently checked in; FATF listing status remains a separate overlay. Candidate sources are research leads only; they have not been ingested as evidence.
- Trafficking: Not available. No reviewed country-level trafficking dataset is currently checked in; no risk value is inferred. Candidate sources are research leads only; they have not been ingested as evidence.
- Financial secrecy and offshore exposure: Not available. No reviewed, licence-clean financial-secrecy index is currently checked in; jurisdiction type alone is not used as a proxy. Candidate sources are research leads only; they have not been ingested as evidence.
- Tax cooperation: Not listed in EU Annex I. Annex I is a political/legal tax-cooperation list, not a general AML, corruption, or country-risk score. Source
- Political stability and conflict: Not available. WGI is an institutional perception indicator, not a conflict event feed or a prediction of future violence. Candidate sources are research leads only; they have not been ingested as evidence.
- Beneficial ownership: Register restricted to authorities. The Open Ownership map is a live-register snapshot and absence means no register was identified in that snapshot, not that no register exists. Source
Regional peer scores
- Sint Maarten: 7.8/10 (Very high)
- British Virgin Islands: 6.8/10 (High)
- Curaçao: 6.3/10 (High)
- Turks and Caicos Islands: 6.2/10 (High)
- Barbados: 5.5/10 (High)
- Gibraltar: 5.5/10 (High)
FAQ
Is Guernsey on the FATF grey list?
No. Guernsey is not on the FATF grey or black list as of the 19 Jun 2026 plenary. FATF listing is one AML indicator; absence from the list does not by itself make Guernsey low risk. The next FATF plenary review is scheduled for Oct 2026.
Is Guernsey subject to sanctions?
No country-level programme was identified. In the approved RegActions snapshot, no comprehensive or targeted country-wide sanctions programme was found for Guernsey, but individual listed persons may still exist, so firms should continue to screen counterparties against the applicable lists.
What is Guernsey's country risk rating?
RegActions rates Guernsey at 3.5/10 (Moderate risk), where a higher score means higher country risk. The v3 score combines AML/CFT effectiveness, technical compliance, and governance and institutions. FATF listing and sanctions are shown as overlays and do not add points. Some information is unavailable, so the available pillars are rebalanced and the result is provisional.
What due diligence applies to Guernsey?
Standard due diligence for most relationships, with enhanced checks where defined risk triggers are present. This is decision-support based on Guernsey's FATF status, governance and sanctions signals, and is not a substitute for a firm's own risk assessment.
How much enforcement activity is tracked for Guernsey?
RegActions has live enforcement coverage from 1 regulator in Guernsey. The current action total is loaded from the source-linked evidence view rather than this country-risk snapshot. Enforcement volume measures regulator activity, not country risk, so it is shown as evidence but never fed into the RegActions Country Risk Score.
Source: FATF black & grey lists · World Bank WGI (CC BY 4.0 — World Bank WGI) · TI CPI (CC BY-ND 4.0 — Transparency International, display only)