Botswana vs South Africa: country risk compared
Botswana currently carries the higher assessed risk (6.0 vs 5.7 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by higher AML/CFT effectiveness risk (9.4 vs 7.6).
🇧🇼 Botswana (6.0/10, High) vs 🇿🇦 South Africa (5.7/10, High).
Side by side
| Indicator | Botswana | South Africa |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 6.0/10 (High) | 5.7/10 (High) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | No listed programme identified |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 3.9/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | 58/100 (rank #41) | 41/100 (rank #81) |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2017 | 2021 |
| BO register | Public (live since 2019) | Restricted (live since 2023) |
FATF mutual evaluations
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Namibia vs South Africa
- Lesotho vs South Africa
- Eswatini vs South Africa
- Ghana vs South Africa
- Malawi vs South Africa
- Morocco vs South Africa
Active methodology 3.1.0; Botswana is complete with low confidence and South Africa is complete with high confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.