Namibia vs South Africa: country risk compared
Namibia and South Africa currently carry a similar assessed risk (5.7 vs 5.7 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), so differentiate on the specific drivers below.
🇳🇦 Namibia (5.7/10, High) vs 🇿🇦 South Africa (5.7/10, High).
Side by side
| Indicator | Namibia | South Africa |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 5.7/10 (High) | 5.7/10 (High) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | No listed programme identified |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 4.2/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | 46/100 (rank #65) | 41/100 (rank #81) |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2023 | 2021 |
| BO register | Public (live since 2023) | Restricted (live since 2023) |
FATF mutual evaluations
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Botswana vs South Africa
- Lesotho vs South Africa
- Eswatini vs South Africa
- Ghana vs South Africa
- Malawi vs South Africa
- Morocco vs South Africa
Active methodology 3.1.0; Namibia is complete with high confidence and South Africa is complete with high confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.