Cayman Islands vs Guam: country risk compared
Cayman Islands currently carries the higher assessed risk (4.9 vs 2.6 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by higher v3 pillar risk overall.
🇰🇾 Cayman Islands (4.9/10, Moderate) vs 🇬🇺 Guam (2.6/10, Moderate).
Side by side
| Indicator | Cayman Islands | Guam |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 4.9/10 (Moderate) | 2.6/10 (Moderate) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | No listed programme identified |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 2.8/10 | 2.9/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | No score | No score |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | No |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2019 | Not assessed |
| BO register | Restricted (live since 2017) | None identified |
FATF mutual evaluations
- Cayman Islands: last mutual evaluation 2019 · report
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Anguilla vs Cayman Islands
- Bermuda vs Cayman Islands
- Antigua and Barbuda vs Cayman Islands
- Bahamas vs Cayman Islands
- Barbados vs Cayman Islands
- Aruba vs Cayman Islands
Active methodology 3.1.0; Cayman Islands is complete with medium confidence and Guam is provisional with low confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.