Malta vs Serbia: country risk compared
Malta currently carries the higher assessed risk (4.8 vs 4.2 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by higher AML/CFT effectiveness risk (7.0 vs 4.5).
🇲🇹 Malta (4.8/10, Moderate) vs 🇷🇸 Serbia (4.2/10, Moderate).
Side by side
| Indicator | Malta | Serbia |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 4.8/10 (Moderate) | 4.2/10 (Moderate) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | Sectoral exposure |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 3.5/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | 49/100 (rank #60) | 33/100 (rank #116) |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2019 | 2025 |
| BO register | Restricted (live since 2018) | Public (live since 2018) |
FATF mutual evaluations
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Malta vs Montenegro
- Croatia vs Malta
- Malta vs Slovenia
- Albania vs Malta
- Malta vs North Macedonia
- Cyprus vs Malta
Active methodology 3.1.0; Malta is complete with medium confidence and Serbia is complete with high confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.