Brunei vs Hong Kong: country risk compared
Brunei currently carries the higher assessed risk (4.3 vs 3.6 on the RegActions 0-10 scale), driven by higher governance and institutions risk (3.3 vs 2.6).
🇧🇳 Brunei (4.3/10, Moderate) vs ðŸ‡ðŸ‡° Hong Kong (3.6/10, Moderate).
Side by side
| Indicator | Brunei | Hong Kong |
|---|---|---|
| RegActions risk score | 4.3/10 (Moderate) | 3.6/10 (Moderate) |
| FATF status | Not currently listed | Not currently listed |
| Sanctions posture | No listed programme identified | Sectoral exposure |
| Governance: rule of law (WGI risk) | 3.2/10 | 2.1/10 |
| Corruption (CPI) | 63/100 (rank #31) | 76/100 (rank #12) |
| EU tax list (Annex I) | Not listed | Not listed |
| Egmont FIU member | Yes | Yes |
| Last FATF mutual evaluation | 2023 | 2019 |
| BO register | Restricted (live since 2021) | None identified |
FATF mutual evaluations
Full country reports
Related comparisons
- Brunei vs Singapore
- Hong Kong vs South Korea
- Hong Kong vs Macau
- Hong Kong vs Taiwan
- Hong Kong vs Japan
- China vs Hong Kong
Active methodology 3.1.0; Brunei is complete with high confidence and Hong Kong is complete with medium confidence. FATF listings and sanctions are shown as regulatory overlays; CPI and enforcement volume are contextual, not score inputs. Scoring methodology.